The agreement should also describe the house you can rent as the floor or apartment number, the area of the house, the number of bedrooms, bathroom, living room, kitchen and so on. If it is a furnished house, make sure there is a list of all fittings and faucets such as beds, sofas, tables, chairs, closets, number of fans, air conditioners, lights and so on. Repaying the amount of the advance after 2 years is not defensible in the spirit of the law. You will therefore be better off returning the amount of the advance after deducting the arrears. If you stay on the lock in the period, then it may or may not be evacuated. Undue profits are limited by law. Even if there was a blocking clause during the period, you can only claim an amount for the entire period for the appropriate losses and allowances you have suffered. This is a clear legal position that, in many cases, is regulated. In the event of a dispute, unregistered leases are not considered by the court as primary evidence Yes! He`s right! You can`t reduce the rent for the free period or you let it stay for as long…. If these rules are not mentioned in the agreement. 2.

Is it appropriate that if you are forced to terminate the contract due to the tenant`s delay during the prohibition period, then the tenant must bear the rent for the entire ban within the period? The clauses in an agreement that provides for a period during which one of the parties cannot terminate the contract are referred to as a blocking clause. If a contractor terminates the contract within the suspension period, such a clause stipulates that the contrasens must pay the rent for the remainder of the prohibition period, even if he would no longer use the premise granted because of the termination of the contract. Owners usually keep the original copy of the lease, but you still need to keep a copy. Similarly, due to a blocking clause, a licensee cannot ask the licensee to give up his place before the three-year conclusion. If the licensee does so, it is an offence, and the licensee can sue the licensee to claim appropriate compensation for the actual harm suffered by the licensee or to demand some compliance with the contract, when it must prove that the non-performance of the contract will cause irreparable harm to the licensee. which cannot be compensated by a cash bonus.